Winter 2003
Minnesota Technology® Magazine
By: Mary Lahr Schier
Contributing Writer, Minnesota Technology magazine
Martin Renk understands abrasion. His company, United
Machine and Foundry of Winona, makes iron and alloy castings used
in road
construction and coal-fired power plants. United's augers and other
components are rugged, well-designed items; they can stand up to
lifetimes of constant wear from gravel, cement, and glass. Like other
manufacturers, however, Renk's firm is facing a different kind of
abrasion now. Lower prices from new competitors-many in China-are
grinding away at his company's business.
He's not alone, either. All over Minnesota-and around
the nation-manufacturers are cutting payrolls, looking for ways to
improve efficiencies, bidding low, and scrambling to compete with
the cheap labor and enhanced manufacturing facilities offered in
China and other parts of Asia. In Minnesota, manufacturing employment
has slumped from its historic high of 448,000 workers in August 2000
to 402,000 by November 2002. This loss of approximately 46,000 manufacturing
jobs wipes out the increases in manufacturing employment that helped
fire up the state's economy in the 1990s. A survey of manufacturers
in Greater Minnesota conducted in January by Minnesota Technology,
Inc. found that many outstate manufacturers are feeling the squeeze
from China. Of those surveyed, 52 percent reported that they faced
competition from China and 50 percent said it was hurting their business.
Moreover, half said they expected competition from China to reduce
their sales by an average of about 20 percent in 2003-and they were
no more optimistic about the next few years.
Nationally, the picture is just as bleak. Manufacturing
employment has dropped each month for the past two and a half years,
cutting more than 2 million jobs. While the current economic climate
certainly has played a part in that decline, company owners and those
who study manufacturing economics echo the sentiments of those participating
in the Minnesota Technology survey. Many believe that the real long-term
threat to manufacturing-and to the rural communities dependent on
manufacturing jobs-is what Donald Zoubek, co-owner of Automated Inc.,
a Ramsey-based machining and extrusion tooling firm, calls "the big
red giant."
"More and more of our customers are feeling the pressure
from China," says Zoubek, who has seen a 50 percent decline in the
electrical discharge-machining portion of his business. "There are
no profits to speak of. We're just turning cash. That's the way manufacturing
is now, just turning cash and trying to find some way to make money
in the future."
"It's hard to tell in a lot of cases where the business
is going," says Jan Meier, treasurer of Meier Tool and Engineering,
an Anoka-based metal stamping firm founded by her husband, Richard. "It's
just gone." Sales at Meier's company have also declined by half since
2000.
"The recession may go away, but China's not going to," says
Meier. "We're on a level playing field with most countries, but not
with China, and it's going to take a lot to get there."
China's advantage
On a recent visit to China, Martin Lehman, CEO of Entronix, a Plymouth-based
maker of electronic circuit boards, toured Wuxi, a suburb of the sprawling
manufacturing city of Shanghai. "I saw a Sony plant going up that was the
size of Disneyland," says Lehman, who also serves on the board of directors
of Minnesota Technology, Inc. "Next to it was a Pioneer plant." He goes on
to list half-dozen prominent multinational electronics firms opening manufacturing
facilities in the same Wuxi industrial park. They can't resist the economic
incentives the Chinese government is offering in order to create up to 29
million manufacturing jobs and bolster its efforts to build a middle class.
Many companies get land for free or nearly so. The government subsidizes
plant construction. It charges virtually no tax, and labor costs a fraction
of what it might in the United States. In addition, China's enforcement of
environmental and labor laws is lax compared to the United States. These
advantages offset the hefty transportation costs in bringing goods from China,
says Fred Zimmerman, a professor of manufacturing systems engineering and
international management at the University of St. Thomas.
The incentives, plus foreign direct investment from
global companies, also have beefed up China's ability to compete
for complex, higher-value manufacturing projects. While there is
plenty of low-skill manufacturing being done in China, Minnesotans
who have visited the county say that the Chinese manufacturing landscape
is changing-and at a rapid rate. "You'll see people on three-wheeled
bicycles delivering products to the most modern facilities," says
Jim Haglund, president of Central Container Corp., a Brooklyn Park-based
packaging manufacturer, who visited China this fall.
The Minnesota Technology, Inc. survey found that while
about 50 percent of state manufacturers consider China the most significant
international competitor they face, many did not think Chinese manufacturers
had better equipment and technology or could produce better-quality
products.
Not everyone agrees with that perception, however.
That may have been true five years ago, but "it's not just about
cheap labor anymore," says Tom Schabel, president of Alexandria Extrusion
Co., who participated in former Gov. Jesse Ventura's 2002 trade mission
to China. "You see a wider spectrum of manufacturing in China than
in other parts of the world. There are some very crude operations
with very low productivity, basically set up on the street. Then,
you'll walk into a factory that's so modern it could be anywhere
in the world."
Still, not everyone views the movement of manufacturing
to China as an economic threat to Minnesota. Toby Madden, a regional
economist with the Federal Reserve Bank in Minneapolis, says, "it's
like the Chinese people giving us a gift. Overall we're better off
because we are trading with China."
Madden also notes that more manufacturing in China
has meant lower consumer prices, less pollution, and other "negative
externalities" associated with manufacturing. He adds that jobs lost
in the manufacturing sector can be replaced by new, perhaps better
jobs in other sectors of the economy. With 1.8 billion people, China
also represents a huge potential market for goods and services.
Minnesota companies have been successful at selling
to China, says Tony Lorusso, the director of export promotion at
the Minnesota Trade Office. China is the state's fourth-largest trading
partner, after Canada, Japan, and Ireland. Minnesota companies sold
$619 million in goods to China in 2001, a nearly 50 percent increase
over sales four years earlier.
Without question, the Chinese recognize the value of
manufacturing as a way to build their economy, says Zimmerman, who
adds that Southeast Asia turns out roughly six times as many science
and engineering graduates as the United States. "From a world perspective,
it's probably a good thing that we share our wealth," he notes. "They
are studying harder; they are improving their skills. We don't seem
to have as much interest in engineering or manufacturing, and that's
a big problem."
In their recent book, Manufacturing Works: The Vital
Link Between Production and Prosperity , Zimmerman and coauthor Dave
Beal argue that the loss of manufacturing jobs is significant because
of their multiplier effects on local economies. After studying 232
counties around the country with high concentrations of manufacturing
employment, Beal and Zimmerman found that a rise in manufacturing
employment could be linked to decreasing poverty rates, lower taxes,
and increasing employment in other sectors of the economy. In counties
where manufacturing employment was on the rise, every major employment
sector grew-with total employment rising between 37 and 63 percent
in the counties studied. At the same time, when manufacturing employment
was in decline, Beal and Zimmerman found that overall job growth
tended to be sluggish. The growth rate was about 10 percent in counties
where manufacturing declined, and that growth tended to be overwhelmingly
in the health care sector, an industry growing in part because of
the aging population.
"When manufacturing thrives, so does the rest of the
economy," Beal and Zimmerman write in the book. "When it declines,
the balance of the economy weakens. Mining, agriculture and a few
other industries also transfer prosperity to other sectors, but manufacturing-with
23 percent of the nation's payroll-is the most significant multiplier
of jobs."
A Milken Institute study of manufacturing in California,
which has lost more than twice as many manufacturing jobs as Minnesota
since 2000, found that each additional manufacturing job produced
two and a half jobs in other sectors of the economy. Zimmerman, however,
isn't convinced. "There is no evidence that the service economy has
a life of its own because it does not generate enough external cash," he
says. "Maybe something like the Mayo Clinic might, because of its
worldwide reputation, but most of the time, local economies won't
grow without manufacturing growth."
Manufacturers respond
Not long ago, Alexandria Extrusion bid on the manufacture of a pulley assembly
for a Harley Davidson motorcycle. Later, it discovered the work might be
going to China, and asked for a chance to rebid the project. "So we said,
'Hey, we've got to come up with an entirely different process to be competitive,'" recalls
Tom Schabel, president of the Alexandria-based aluminum extrusion company.
A team of employees went to work redesigning the manufacturing process for
the pulley to see if they could make it faster and cheaper. They put in a
new bid and were awarded the contract. "It's a balancing act," says Schabel. "The
point of the story is that there are ways to be competitive on some products."
With revenues of more than $40 million annually and
a workforce of about 300, Alexandria Extrusion has found that investments
in technology and employee training are helping it stay competitive. "One
of our advantages is the caliber of our people-and we have invested
a lot in training them," says Schabel. "Their productivity can often
off-set cheaper prices from other manufacturers."
Still, the company has not been immune to pressures
from either China or the current economic downturn. Sales at Alexandria
Extrusion have dropped more than 25 percent since 2001. But it has
been aggressively pursuing opportunities in its niches, which include
medical diagnostic equipment, electronics, and consumer durables,
as well as the automotive sector. "You can't be doing business as
usual now," says Schabel. "That will get you into all sorts of trouble.
You have to understand the market-and that may mean going after a
different market than you have before. You're going to have to invest
in training and equipment, and you're going to have to service the
heck out of your customers."
With China as a more prominent competitor, manufacturers
may need to expand services or develop more specialized products.
Says Zimmerman: "We can only compete if we have highly technical
products with large world markets where we do most of the value-added
work here."
At Winona's United Machine, providing a more valuable
product has required that the company create that product itself.
Two years ago, began developing a new type of iron that could
be used in many of the castings the company produces. "Not much metallurgic
research has been done since the 1960s," says Renk. "Most of the
iron and nickel composites used in the business now were developed
by mining companies back then. Things look really promising, but
it takes time and it takes money."
Staying in business long enough to make that transition
has been difficult for many Minnesota manufacturers. "Technology
businesses like these are heavily capitalized," says Zoubek of Automated
Inc. "The machines cost $100,000 to $300,000, and we're employing
skilled workers at high wage rates."
Zoubek and the companies he works for find they simply
must keep costs as low as possible in order to compete with similar
products from China. "With wages in the high $20s per hour, and with
benefits and interest payments on equipment, it's almost impossible
to make money," says Zoubek. "It's no wonder so many companies have
gone out of business."
Many firms have tried to expand other lines of work
to replace work that has gone to China. For instance, Jan Meier's
company specializes in metal stamping tiny parts, and cell phones
had been a big part of the business. But Meier Tool and Engineering
also produces disposable needles and scissors for the medical industry,
as well as small components for the electric systems in automobiles. "We're
all stretching our brains to figure out how to compete," says Meier.
Her firm has tried to increase its presence in the medical field,
but the orders tend to be smaller. As a result, the company trimmed
its workforce from 55 to 35. "Everybody's got a cell phone, but not
everybody has to have surgery," she says.
Zoubek also has been relying on a second service his
company provides. In addition to electrical-discharge machining,
Automated Inc. makes dies and calibration systems for plastic extrusion
of products such as vinyl window frames. The work requires more hands-on
effort than other products, and typically Zoubek's employees will
go to a client's site to complete the development of the tooling. "They
can be difficult to build," he says, adding that he thought it would
be one part of the business safe from overseas competition. Then
in the first week of January, he saw an ad in an industry publication.
A Chinese firm was promoting itself as a toolmaker for plastic extrusions.
"I don't know how they are going to do it," says Zoubek. "But
I know they'll figure it out somehow."
Like other manufacturers, Zoubek believes we are undergoing
a fundamental change in what kind of manufacturing is done in the
United States. "Yes, the economy will come back, but manufacturing
will never be like before," he says. "I can't tell you what it will
be, but in a year or two years, it will be something completely different."
-Mary Lahr Schier is a Northfield-based business journalist. |